If your goal is to develop the deep skill of persuasive grant writing - so that you can spend less time writing rejected proposals, enjoy the writing process more, and be more efficient, then consider this: do you have time to attend most or all of the two day live workshop? Or would you prefer to take your time, go at your own pace, and and skip the line to get ongoing access to the Grant Dynamo 3 course - plus bonuses - at a the biggest tuition discount you’ll see over the upcoming year? If you choose this option, you can take your time, go at your own pace, and repeat the lessons as many times as you like while you write your proposals.
You can take advantage of this immediately using the registration link on the right, or read below for more information.
Use the button above to get in on the private Summer Sale for the course. You'll be sent an email with the link to take advantage of the special sale tuition for the Grant Dynamo 3 course, designed for researchers like you.
One of the most important questions about your chances of research grant funding:
The fact is, most research grant proposals are boring at best, and extremely frustrating at worst. Even if you have fantastic research and a strong track record, most reviewers won't be able to look beyond the boredom, irritation, and frustration they could experience reading your proposal. If so, your review scores will suffer (e.g. NIH Impact scores). Can you afford that kind of negative impact on your grant scores in an environment where paylines can be as challenging as 1 in 12 funded (8%)?
If you're not a fan of wasting your time on needless rejection, then perhaps it's time to learn the deeper triggers for the frustration and boredom - and most importantly, how to avoid them. That's where the Grant Story comes in.
If you don't have a compelling "story" (constructed appropriately for a scientific/research audience), then it is much less likely you will get the attention and interest of reviewers needed for their support. Good science/research is not enough - many of your colleagues are doing great (or at least good) research too. So if your proposal is in a stack of proposals with one-in-eight to one-in-twelve chances of funding (typical pay lines at NIH), it needs to be the one out of eight or more that your reviewer picks to advocate for. If you rely solely on the idea that your science/research will "sell itself", you are relying on a lottery.
It always surprises me that so many researchers seem to think grant funding is indeed a lottery - that is, until I consider the preceding sentence. Many researchers rely on the "goodness" of their science/research to sell itself. Or - worse - they rely on outdated concepts of presentation that use ineffective strategies like overwhelming the reader with facts or authority.
While facts and data are very important in research proposals, they must be put into an appropriate context to connect powerfully with your readers. And that is where the power of story comes in: it provides the framework in which we present our facts and data in just the right order and context to yield the highest potential interest. Once you develop the skill of weaving your facts, data, and projects into clear and compelling story, you'll likely find that your readers are more engaged, interested, and ready to support you.
Yet it is a skill that few researchers possess. We aren't trained in story, we're trained in how to do research. They are two entirely different animals, yet developing the skill of effective story creation can take just as long as developing effective research skills. That's especially true if you approach it with trial-and-error, trying to use (often) obtuse reviewer feedback to figure out what was wrong with your story, correcting it, and waiting another 4-6 months for feedback.
I've worked with clients for over a decade on developing the skill of more effective proposal writing - i.e. telling an effective story. Through that work, I identified the specific elements and order in which they're presented that defines some of the most compelling grant stories I've seen - ones that resonated with reviewers and gained funding.
The question for most researchers who don't have a PhD in "telling effective story about their research" is this: how do you get the training and skills you need to craft your grant story more effectively, so that your reviewer has a better experience with your proposal and is more likely to support it for funding?
The Grant Dynamo 3 course is the culmination of a decade of work training researchers in the US and across the globe how to write more compelling stories. Grant Dynamo 3 is the most advanced course we've taught, distilling the process down to a step-by-step approach you can apply to your own proposals now and in the future. It presents the framework of the "Grant Story Funnel," and walks you through it step-by-step. At each step, you're given details and examples about the function that part of the story has, and how to do it effectively. You're given exercises (with worksheets) you can use each time you start a new proposal, to walk you step by step through the process, until you master it.
My team and I have applied the Grant Story Funnel to many client proposals to analyze what is working - and not working - and it brings rapid clarity to the process I have not seen from any other method available.
So if you want that kind of clarity about your own proposals - to maximize your efficiency and productivity in gaining the funding you need to keep your research going - then the Grant Dynamo 3 may be the golden ticket. And the good news is that it's available at the lowest tuition of any grant writing course I've created since 2012. I want to make it as accessible to the widest range of people possible.
Important note: The Grant Dynamo 3 (Level I) focuses exclusively on the Specific Aims page (or equivalent front page), and does not cover other parts of the proposal in any detail. The story you develop in this course can be used for the rest of your proposal, but there is not (yet) detailed instruction on that. If you desire training on other parts of the proposal, you can take advantage of the Grant Dynamo 2 as a complimentary course to Grant Dynamo 3.
On the registration page, we provide the opportunity to bundle the two courses together at the biggest tuition discount I've ever offered. If you opt for the bundle, I suggest you start your work with Grant Dynamo 3, then dive deeper into the extensive content of Grant Dynamo 2 as needed.
I am truly thrilled to share the Grant Story Funnel with you, so that you can have more efficiency, less rejection, and help me in my goal of making the whole research endeavor to be a more efficient and fun place to work in.
I created the Grant Dynamo 3 online course to facilitate your ongoing, long-term practice for deep skills development. It consists of Eight Core Modules that walk you through the Grant Story Funnel step-by-step, showing you how to create a compelling, persuasive grant story. It is designed to be used AS YOU WRITE your next proposal. At every step, I give you examples of how to put powerful words to your research from funded proposals, substantially accelerating your learning curve.
The Grant Dynamo 3 is an online course that you can visit and revisit as often as you like, from the comfort and safety of your home or office. (Image is of welcome screen)
Grant Dynamo 3 is eight Modules of Course Training Materials, to take you Step-by-Step through crafting your Grant Story Funnel.
The content is provided via HD videos and you will have ongoing access (minimum of two years).
You'll be able to pause the lessons to do the exercises, that will substantially strengthen your implementation of the material.
We will also provide you with downloadable audio versions to take on the go with you when commuting or doing housework or whatever.
In your member's area, you will also get access to all the slides, worksheets, and proposal examples for downloading whenever you need them for a proposal you're working on.
You'll get immediate access to Modules 1 and 2, then weekly after that the additional modules will unlock. This gives you time to do the worksheets and apply them to your own writing efforts.
It may seem like ten plus hours of training is enough to cover it all, but as with any deeper skill, that's not enough. There are aspects and nuances I just didn't have time to cover in the primary training, but I wanted to include these resources for you. For example:
Substantial Discount on Grant Dynamo 2: The Grant Dynamo 2 is a comprehensive grant writing course I previously created, covering all parts of the proposal, along with many deeper skills like framing, implicit writing, and others that help you write more powerfully. It is a perfect combination with the Grant Dynamo 3, which is more focused and step-by-step implementation on the Specific Aims (or equivalent) page.
If you choose to add on Grant Dynamo 2 to your Grant Dynamo 3 registration, you will get a 50% discount on the tuition for Grant Dynamo 2 - an unprecedented discount. With the combination of the two classes, you will have every tool at your disposal for mastering the writing of strong, compelling proposals that are likely to engage and connect with your readers.
Based on over 10 years of working with clients, we developed a step-by-step approach to building a stellar "front page" (Specific Aims, Project Summary, etc) for your proposal using the proprietary Grant Story Funnel. The course has eight modules that walk you through each step of developing an enthusiasm-generating Grant Story Funnel, using examples from eleven funded proposals to NIH, NSF, and DOD.
Your reviewer's state of mind, and how the subtleties of what you write may impact that profoundly. Using appropriate research to steer the response in your favor.
If you want a strong positive response, your proposal needs to be a story. This module shows you how to do that, breaking it down into the key steps you can follow to increase your chances of enthusiasm, every time.
The foundational step of your story is a strong "Why The Reader Should Care" - but most people end up using generic, boring, boilerplate - which is the opposite of what you should do. This module breaks down for you exactly what to do, with a plethora of examples to illustrate.
It's easy to rush immediately from the "WHY" into your objective or hypothesis - before the reader is ready for it. This leads to defensive responses (lower scores). It's essential to prime the reviewer so they are excited and ready for your WHAT. This module shows you how to do that, and the mistakes to avoid -- using funded examples.
The Grant Story Funnel
You may be clear on WHAT you are proposing to do, but conveying that to your reviewer in terms of a clear and compelling Objective or Hypothesis statement is not simple. There are many ways to mess this up and create confusion. This module covers a rigorous, step-by-step method for developing a strong WHAT in your proposal.
A major facet of your review will be whether you've convinced the reviewers to trust that you and your team are the best people for the job. This is far more than just slapping a bunch of biosketches together - there are both explicit and implicit things to pay careful attention to on your front page (Specific Aims, Project Summary) that will have a major effect on the response you get.
It's easy to just throw together some factual statements about "what you will do" in your aims (or objectives for NSF). Will that convince your reviewer that your aims are compelling? It's unlikely, because there are many aspects of structuring the aims for maximal impact that most proposal writers miss - especially to fit appropriately into your story. This module shows you how, with examples.
How do you summarize the impact of your proposal succinctly and powerfully? This module shows you how, in a way that fits into your Grant Story Funnel. It also covers how to respond to reviews of a rejected proposal by reading "deep" between the lines of the reviews. Lastly, it covers big-picture strategic thinking that will help you determine when is the ideal time to apply - and when not to.
We have three different plans for tuition payment, listed below.
* There will be a $20 fee for Purchase Orders due to the processing time involved, or your institution can use a purchasing card with no additional fee.
You'll need to arrange with your institution the approval of the tuition payment, and we'll take care of the rest once approved. Once they've paid us, we refund your $100 back to the original source.
You can reach us at: [email protected]
You can try out the course for a full 30 days. If you decide to not continue for any reason within that period, just let us know at [email protected] and we'll give you a prompt tuition refund.
This way, if you're not sure, you can try it at no risk to you.
“Hi Morgan, I am not sure if you got my previous email, where I let you know that I got 4% on my last RO1. Today I learned that I got also 4% on my R21!
So thank you again. You may use my example that even from a “bad” stubborn student you can make quite successful grant writer.
Thank you again,”
“Morgan Giddings online grant writing courses have totally changed my views on grant writing; I now enjoy the process, and I am able to help my lab members improve their grants.”
“...it is totally true that my last R01 was the easiest grant I have ever written and it was fun. Clarity changed the grant from work to flow. It took me 3 months to lock in the specific aims but then The grant just kind of flowed out of me so easily. I actually enjoyed it!”
Yes, there is! We can split up your tuition payment over a four-month period, at no extra charge. See "payment plan" above.
We make it a high priority to respect our clients' privacy, and do not give out contact information. We provide some general quotes from past students who volunteered these unsolicited. We also offer a 30 day tuition back guarantee so you can give the materials a test drive yourself.
If others claim specific numbers or funding rates for their classes or consulting, be wary. Such numbers are not at all meaningful unless obtained in a carefully controlled study performing a long-term comparison of students without intervention versus those with intervention. Further, the results depend on the student's effort as much or more than the teacher's. Having an instructor "guarantee" a certain level of success for their students would be impossible.
What we can say is that we've had a lot of feedback from those who've used the methods we've taught successfully, not only for grants but for other kinds of communications (like manuscripts) as well.
The main lessons of the course total about 10 hours. With your ongoing (minimum two years) access, you can take your time, and review as often as you want. However, to be realistic, understand that the real time involved is in your iterative application of these principles to your live grant proposals, and that is likely to be a substantial investment of time. However, that is unlikely to be more than you'd already invest in writing and submitting proposals via trial-and-error.
Yes, there is! Verified students and postdocs receive a 40% discount on the regular tuition of $570, bringing it to $342. You can also use a payment plan, bringing that to only $57/month for 6 months. This is a small investment that will pay off on a career-long basis. Email us your verification to receive the discount link.
Yes, there is! Grant Dynamo 2 students who enrolled in the past three months can get an add-on of Grant Dynamo 3 Level I for $305 Tuition. Those who enrolled prior will receive a $150 discount, to $420 tuition.
If you're ready to stop the time-wasting, career-slowing cycle of trial-and-error grant submissions, perhaps it's time to invest a bit of time and tuition money now to take charge of your proposal writing - so that you can long-term spend less time writing rejected grants and more time on the research that matters.
Note: No class, no matter how well-constructed, is a substitute for your own hard work as a student. If you do not invest your time on an ongoing basis in developing these crucial skills, you absolutely will not get any useful results by enrolling in the class, or via any other means we are aware of.
While we do our best to represent your potential results accurately, understand that your results ultimately depend on your effort more than they do any other factor - including our teaching and materials. The class materials are provided solely as a guide to focus those efforts, and reduce the cycle of time-wasting that so many researchers experience when it comes to grant proposal writing. There is no other claim about your results being represented here, except that as with all of life, the more effort you put in, the more you will get out - and that having an experienced guide such as this class can generally facilitate a more efficient journey.